Interior Designer Thinks Americans Need Less Storage Than 18th Century France

SemainierWhile leaving the Elle Decor Barclay Butera event last week, I snagged a free copy of the magazine.

There’s a great article on a piece of furniture called a "semainer.  We’ve obviously all used one, but we personally did not know it’s history.  We also didn’t know that one Interior Designer says a popular women’s undergarment has single-handedly reduced our storage needs, and thus our desire for this hefty piece of storage furniture.

"Before there was day-of-the-week underwear, there was the semainier.  Popularized in 18th-century France, these seven-drawer dressers (the name comes from the French word for week, semaine) were intended to separate the copious personal linens of the time into Monday-through-Sunday supplies.

Take note, however:  The form has outlived the function.  "Gone are the days of bustiers and corsets," says New Jersey-based designers Jennifer Watty with a laugh.  "This is the age of the thong.  Who needs seven drawers for their underwear?"

Who is Ms. Watty kidding?  We need more storage here in America (and in Los Angeles) and not less storage.  Do you agree?

  • See the Elle Decor slideshow with a professional’s commentary

John_trosko_2

Comments

11 responses to “Interior Designer Thinks Americans Need Less Storage Than 18th Century France”

  1. Karli Avatar
    Karli

    My vote is we NEED more storage!

  2. Lissanne Oliver Avatar

    America needs more storage?!?! John, are you kidding? America desperately needs LESS STUFF!

  3. Brandie Kajino Avatar

    Interesting question. I think it depends on what’s important to you. Buying a bigger home with more storage isn’t likely to solve the “I don’t have enough space” question. Having said that, it seems like modern homes (in suburbia) don’t have the storage built into them that the older homes do.
    Personally I like less stuff. It’s less time and commitment that I have to have to take care of it all. Maybe that makes me a “stuff” commitment phobe…. 😉

  4. Cynthia D'Amour Avatar

    I live in a 100 year old house. There is a walk-in closet to support all three bedrooms. The two smaller bedrooms both have an old iron bar about 18 inches long to hang clothes on.
    Supposedly they raised 10 kids in this house at one time. Not sure where they put the kids – let alone their clothes!
    I dream of more closet space. Good thing my house is very cute!

  5. Claire Tompkins Avatar

    I’m with Brandie. The relationship of the quantity of stuff to the amount of storage space in your house follows a variation of Parkinson’s Law. In other words, the amount of stuff you have increases so as to fill the space available to store it.
    I’m not against having stuff. I like stuff! But I don’t think we’ll reach that magic point of equilibrium where all the stuff has storage. Kind of like all those freeways they keep building that traffic catches up to before they’re finished…

  6. John Trosko Avatar

    Hey Claire,
    I had not heard of Parkinson’s law. I’ll look it up. I grew up in the east coast, in a home built in 1960. We had huge wall to wall closets with heavy wood doors. And anything we didn’t want, went into the attic. I think my parents never threw much away!
    But as an adult, I can see pretty quickly if a home has enough storage. But I think it’s all relative. If you like to do your office work in the kitchen, and there are papers and office supplies strewn about, it’s not the storage in the kitchen at fault– it’s yours. You must adapt and either move your office to another room, or build in the kitchen. Adaptation is key. You can’t have it your way unless you invest in your space– something many folks don’t want to do.

  7. Claire Tompkins Avatar

    John,
    Yes, adaptation is key. So is being realistic! People who work in the kitchen often turn out to have a lovely office elsewhere in the house, but they never go in there, for whatever reason.
    Sometimes they’ve set up a quite workable office in the dining room, but it bugs them because, well, it’s the dining room. I remind them that they’ve already told me they only use the dining room twice a year for family gatherings. But if their parents and grandparents had a formal dining room, they want one too, even if it’s just for show.
    Getting people to adapt their homes to the way they actually live right now, to make life easier, is really important.

  8. Monica Ricci Avatar

    An interesting conversation. I am generally of the opinion that we need a combination of LESS STUFF and MORE EFFECTIVE STORAGE.
    In my work with Beazer Homes, one of the things we’re working on and always talking about is building homes that have an abundance of storage, not just in the places you’d expect it, but also in areas where you might not. It’s storage where you need it most, not just bigger closets or a larger garage.
    ~Monica

  9. Monica Ricci Avatar

    PS: I have OFTEN told my clients of Parkinson’s Law when they sigh heavily and say, “We just need a bigger house”.
    UUuurrrrrrrcccchhhh!! Stop right there! That’s a wonderful teaching opportunity, to bring to light that Parkinson’s Law is indeed true that stuff WILL expand to fill whatever space is available. So unless you address the habits and attitudes that create the clutter issue to begin with, you’ll have a bigger house with even MORE stuff to get out from under.
    ~Monica

  10. anonymous Avatar
    anonymous

    John, I think Ms. Watty has a point. We need less storage, not more. People keep on buying stuff, jamming it in the drawers, and you don’t even know what’s in there. Less is more.

  11. kelleyfurniture Avatar

    Interesting question, it is needed to have more storage but sometimes it all depends upon the purchasing something bigger or smaller.
    Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *